The evidence keeps mounting

More proof -- this time from that bastion of pinko propaganda, U.S. News and World Report -- that Bush, Inc., lied about Dubya's "service" record:

The service question
A review of President Bush's Guard years raises issues about the time he served
by Kit R. Roane

Last February, White House spokesman Scott McClellan held aloft sections of President Bush's military record, declaring to the waiting press that the files "clearly document the president fulfilling his duties in the National Guard." Case closed, he said.

But last week the controversy reared up once again, as several news outlets, including U.S. News, disclosed new information casting doubt on White House claims.

A review of the regulations governing Bush's Guard service during the Vietnam War shows that the White House used an inappropriate--and less stringent--Air Force standard in determining that he had fulfilled his duty. Because Bush signed a six-year "military service obligation," he was required to attend at least 44 inactive-duty training drills each fiscal year beginning July 1. But Bush's own records show that he fell short of that requirement, attending only 36 drills in the 1972-73 period, and only 12 in the 1973-74 period. The White House has said that Bush's service should be calculated using 12-month periods beginning on his induction date in May 1968. Using this time frame, however, Bush still fails the Air Force obligation standard....

There's more here.

Again, as far as I'm concerned, it's not so much that Dubya, like the posse of chickenhawks that people his administration, avoided serving in Vietnam. It's that he blew off his commitment to the National Guard and, worst of all, has been lying about it ever since.

Posted by brett at 04:41 PM | TrackBack